W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: RDF Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:39:48 +0000
To: Stefan Kokkelink <stefan.Kokkelink@gmx.de>
cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <9941.1015961988@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Stefan Kokkelink said:
> Hi,
> 
> just curious: can I conclude from the proposed solution
> that rdf:id now *always* has the semantic of reification
> on property elements? If so, what about
> 
> <foo:a rdf:id="reifyWhat?" foo:b="b" foo:c="c"/>
> 
> Or is this not legal anymore?

This remains legal but *now* rdf:ID always means reify rather than
previous meaning of identifying the new object node.

It reifys the statement (subject, predicate, object)
   <parent node URI> <URI of foo:a> <new object node>

> 
> Note: I just started to look through the archive
> after some time of absence, so this may be
> a silly question :-)

we are currently generating and checking test cases and
the (not yet approved) ones are at:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/

I think the tests (probably test001.rdf & test001.nt ?)
should answer your question.

Cheers

Dave
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 16:41:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT