- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:39:48 +0000
- To: Stefan Kokkelink <stefan.Kokkelink@gmx.de>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>>>Stefan Kokkelink said: > Hi, > > just curious: can I conclude from the proposed solution > that rdf:id now *always* has the semantic of reification > on property elements? If so, what about > > <foo:a rdf:id="reifyWhat?" foo:b="b" foo:c="c"/> > > Or is this not legal anymore? This remains legal but *now* rdf:ID always means reify rather than previous meaning of identifying the new object node. It reifys the statement (subject, predicate, object) <parent node URI> <URI of foo:a> <new object node> > > Note: I just started to look through the archive > after some time of absence, so this may be > a silly question :-) we are currently generating and checking test cases and the (not yet approved) ones are at: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/ I think the tests (probably test001.rdf & test001.nt ?) should answer your question. Cheers Dave
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 16:41:10 UTC