W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus

From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:29:24 -0000
To: "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c1b930$4f497ef0$0301050a@mitchum>
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It's acceptable to me.

Bill de hÓra

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] 
> Sent: 18 February 2002 15:54
> To: dehora@acm.org
> Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus
> 
> 
> Bill,
> 
> In
> 
>    
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152.
> html  
> 
> you raised an issue which was captured in
> 
   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus

as

[[[
Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF
is 
hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that
a 
glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This
is a 
general issue for all RDF specifications.
]]]

As recorded in

  
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html

the RDFCore WG resolved:

   the WG resolves that this issue is addressed
   by the primer and that this issue be closed.

Please could you respond to this message, copying
www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPHIo/uaWiFwg2CH4EQIOzwCgvqDyflAs69yL6mbfNugMAtLS9RYAoPkO
JSDwC7sF9MlL2xMZU713gi7I
=+hno
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 05:42:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT