RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus

Bill,

In

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus

as

[[[
Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF is 
hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that a 
glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This is a 
general issue for all RDF specifications.
]]]

As recorded in

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html

the RDFCore WG resolved:

   the WG resolves that this issue is addressed
   by the primer and that this issue be closed.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair