RDF Issue

Dan,

In

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0077.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism

as

[[[
There are gotchas in representing the current RDF model in a logical 
formalism. For example, a statement is defined as triple containing 
containing at least two, possibly three resources. Resources are not 
reasonable things to include in a triple.
]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0294.html

the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue on the grounds:

The WG closes rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the
model theory adequately addresses this issue.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair