W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

RDF Issue

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:31:47 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011211152922.01fdac98@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan,

In

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0077.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism

as

[[[
There are gotchas in representing the current RDF model in a logical 
formalism. For example, a statement is defined as triple containing 
containing at least two, possibly three resources. Resources are not 
reasonable things to include in a triple.
]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0294.html

the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue on the grounds:

The WG closes rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the
model theory adequately addresses this issue.

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 10:32:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT