W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Updated RDF Grammar

From: Karsten-A. Otto <ottoka@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:07:00 +0100 (MET)
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10111211259380.15478-100000@snaxel>
Dave Beckett wrote:

> 
> Although, I can't see what use an empty <rdf:RDF/> would be, it is still OK.
> 
> I hope this answers your questions
> 

Thank you, and yes, this answers my questions. An empty <rdf:RDF/> expresses
an empty model. It may be useful in set-operations involving multiple
(partial) models, for example merging and difference.

Regards,

Karsten Otto
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 07:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:17 UTC