W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Sirpac Errors?

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:52:17 -0500
To: puninj@cs.rpi.edu
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010330085217.A17791@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:18:42PM -0500, puninj@cs.rpi.edu wrote:
> I think these are two errors that I found in Sirpac:
> 
> The first example produces this triple:
> (online:#genid5, http://www.foo.org/foo-ns#value, 6)
> 
> The second example produces this triple:
> (online:#genid5, value, 6) 
> 
> where the "value" property does not belong to
> the namespace: http://www.foo.org/foo-ns#

John - it does seem like the value of these two properties
should be the same.  However, which one is "correct" is
not clear as the following thread indicates:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Mar/0207.html

I agree with Lee Jonas' sentiment in:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Mar/0246.html

that the M&S spec needs to address this issue.  The issue:

 http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

is related but does not explicitly cover this issue.  

Anyhow, I added this as MAR-28-2001-1 to:

 http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/SiRPAC-defects.html

> 2) This example produces the following triples:
> 
> I think the object of the triples should be:
> 
> online:#n1 instead of online:##n1, and
> online:#n2 instead of online:##n2

The servlet chooses to use "online:#" as the document's base 
[if Parse RDF is selected].  Perhaps it should not use 
anything or use "online:" but it is consistent.

Art
---
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 08:52:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT