On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not > those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties: > > rdf:is rdf:type; create a "predicate" class whose members have the appropriate property. > rdf:isNot Yikes! Boom. That was the sound of the semantic web blowing up :-) This leads to non-monotonicity, which doesn't sit particularly well with the RDF worldview, as far as I can tell (no doubt the daml/oil people may say differently) -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 06:16:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:17:02 GMT