W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 21:09:27 -0600
To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CDA586.248DA%aswartz@upclink.com>
The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not
those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties:

rdf:is
rdf:isNot

This saves us from having to do something klugey like:

<http://www.aaronsw.com/> bob:likesChocolate 0 .

and also allows RDF processors to know that it's part of two-valued logic
and treat it properly.

-- 
Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|       The Info Network
  <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |     <http://theinfo.org>
AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 22:09:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT