The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties: rdf:is rdf:isNot This saves us from having to do something klugey like: <http://www.aaronsw.com/> bob:likesChocolate 0 . and also allows RDF processors to know that it's part of two-valued logic and treat it properly. -- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to beReceived on Thursday, 8 March 2001 22:09:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:17:02 GMT