Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > The simplest answer that meets my needs is: "no, > it's not an RDF document; there is no rdf:aboutEach > attribute in RDF; we're sorry for creating any > impression that there was one.": ;-) I like this choice a lot, but I'm not sure how we do this within our "reinterpretation" theme. How is this a valid interpretation of the spec? Or are we going to claim "insufficient implementation experience" again? -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com> ]Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 01:43:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:08 GMT