W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusioN

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:22:23 -0500
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B70C34F4.9F86%aswartz@swartzfam.com> 
Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html

> [[
>   All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified
> ]]

What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement?
Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default
elements. Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice?


-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 09:22:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:08 GMT