- From: Bill dehOra <wdehora@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:45:55 +0100
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, CC/PP WG list <w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org>
>with context, they is no more contradiction; >we can just infer that the two contexts do not share a common >view of the logo, >and that it won't be safe to mix statement from both of them. > > Pierre-Antoine > >NOTE1 : >the 4-uple model (subject, predicate, object, context) could >be built *above* RDF, >by means of reification. Could you do it with a binding predicate and keep two triples? Maybe something like this: statement S: (http://w3.org/logo , s1:imageType , s1:GIF ,) (http://here.com/foo.rdf, binds, S) Then perhaps there is time to add a binding predicate to RDFS? -Bill de hÓra
Received on Friday, 23 June 2000 03:49:16 UTC