W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > February 2004

Re: RDF Calendar report to SemWeb IG next week?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:52:07 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040224165207.GC17681@homer.w3.org>

* Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> [2004-02-24 10:34-0600]
> Hi Libby and everybody,
> I don't know how many of you know that DanBri is finishing
> up an agenda for a Semantic Web Interest Group meeting next
> week; it currently says:
> "[tues am] www-rdf-calendar Task Force [w/ Libby Miller; @@+Dan
> Connolly] 20-30mins ...status/plans/outcomes? declare victory? can we
> show RDF adding value here? (use this as an example of IG/WG
> collaboration?)"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/meetings/tp2004.html
> $Date: 2004/02/23 19:28:32 $
> I was hoping to put together some slides, but my week is now
> filling up, and it doesn't look good.

Some sort of status/report or show'n'tell, brainstorm etc would be 
very welcome...

> Also, I need to be at another meeting on Tuesday.

We could switch days...
> So... Libby, anybody else, any thoughts?

Here's how I've been thinking:

Our working hypothesis was as follows: An RDF reflection of the
iCalendar data structures would be valuable since it would make it 
possible to mix calendar info with other relevant info describing 
people, places, documents, organisations, tasks etc. We've now had 
a few years experience with this approach, I'm wondering what there 
is to say in conclusion. Was this approach useful? What problems did 
we encounter? what can we do to build on this work?

thinking out loud,

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 11:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC