W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2004

Re: priority bug, to libby and dan

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:04:21 +0100 (BST)
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: leo@gnowsis.com, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0404081602120.2503@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Libby, I like the way http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendarDocumentation
> indexes into decisions we've made. But since we've got rfc2445.html,
> maybe we could/should prune some of the stuff from the RFC from
> RdfCalendarDocumentation and just maintain an issues list.
> Hmm...

Sure, I'm happy either way, as long as there's some sort of a paper
trail. Makes sense to use rfc2445.html rather than copy and paste the
bits of the RFC into another document. I guess we can just link to the
relevant parts of rfc2445.html to link in the issues?

Received on Thursday, 8 April 2004 11:06:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC