Re: priority bug, to libby and dan

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Dan Connolly wrote:
[snip]

>
> Libby, I like the way http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendarDocumentation
> indexes into decisions we've made. But since we've got rfc2445.html,
> maybe we could/should prune some of the stuff from the RFC from
> RdfCalendarDocumentation and just maintain an issues list.
> Hmm...

Sure, I'm happy either way, as long as there's some sort of a paper
trail. Makes sense to use rfc2445.html rather than copy and paste the
bits of the RFC into another document. I guess we can just link to the
relevant parts of rfc2445.html to link in the issues?

Libby