W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2004

Re: priority bug, to libby and dan

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:16:23 -0500
To: leo@gnowsis.com
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-Id: <1081433782.16761.11491.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:06, Leo Sauermann wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>     raise RuntimeError, "missing default type: %s -> %s" %\
> RuntimeError: missing default type: PRIORITY -> ('priority', 0, None)

Yeah, I was sloppy when I added PRIORITY support for Vtodos.
fixed in
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/fromIcal.py revision: 2.13

> on a normal ics file from outlook.
> file is attached.

and now it's in...
with corresponding...

Hmm... to datatype or not to datatype. RFC2445 says
PRIORITY takes an INTEGER but I represented it in RDF
as an integer literal:

          >Test Termin</summary

Just yesterday, in consultation with SeanP, I decided
to represent the floats in GEO as real RDF floats:

 -- http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/test/geo1.ics


Libby, I like the way http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendarDocumentation
indexes into decisions we've made. But since we've got rfc2445.html,
maybe we could/should prune some of the stuff from the RFC from
RdfCalendarDocumentation and just maintain an issues list.

> greetings
> Leo
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2004 10:15:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:12 UTC