W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Updates to tools

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:36:06 +0100 (BST)
To: George Huo <ghuo@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0309031027240.14420-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>


Hi George

This is great news...but...have you talked to Morten Frederiksen about
this? he was actioned to work on roundtripping the ical<->RDF tests
some weeks ago in an RDF calendar meeting:

http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/06/25/2003-06-25.html#1056557026.871899

and has also done a substantial amount of work:

http://www.wasab.dk/morten/2003/06/cal/action.html

We've also had some discussions about x-properties and roundtripping -
see the brief summary in the agenda for next meeting:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Sep/0002.html

Perhaps you and he could talk about this? If you could come to the next
RDF calendar meeting, that would be useful, as roundtripping is on the
agenda. (I thought orginally the meeting was today, but it's next week).

cheers

Libby


On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, George Huo wrote:

>
>
> 	I tried to send this message originally over a week ago,
> but ran into problems with the W3C List Manager registering my
> approval. Hopefully this makes it through!
>
> ----- Forwarded message from ghuo -----
>
> To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
> Subject: Updates to tools
>
>
> Hello,
>
> 	I have been working on 2000/10/swap/pim/toIcal.py and
> 2002/12/cal/ical2rdf.pl for the past few weeks. I had the original goal
> of round-trip testing, and I soon discovered that I had to add a good
> deal of functionality to pass any test cases. Currently, all 20 test
> cases in $CAL/test round-trip successfully. I adopted Tim's regression
> test harness pieces from cwm, which now live at $CAL/test/cal-retest.py
> and $CAL/test/cal-regression.n3. To run the tests:
>
> $ cd 2002/12/cal/
> $ make test
>
> Note that I've been testing using an old copy of swap with cwm 1.132;
> something related to URI.py seems to break the tests in the current swap.
> 	toIcal.py is more modular now. It should be easier to add
> enumerated and text fields; see exportGeneral().`X-' fields work, though
> they currently depend on the namespace being called "x:".
> 	In ical2rdf.pl, I fixed parameters that were enumerated types
> (and should be symbols) that were being ignored. The parameter parsing
> no longer trips up on values that contain colons enclosed in quotes (see
> cal02). It also correctly handles fields that can be both enumerated
> values or free text.
> 	While coding and reading the spec, there were a few issues that
> were unclear. First, toIcal.py was originally stripping spaces from
> every field exported as text. This broke round-tripping in many of the
> examples that contained "TZNAME=BST ". I removed the strip; is this how
> we want to handle TEXT types? (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.txt
> 4.8.3.2, 4.3.11)
> 	The ATTACH field is supposed to be of type `uri,' so it is
> represented using rdf:resource. However, in a couple cases (see
> 20030115mtg), the usage appears:
> 	ATTACH;VALUE=URI:Ping
> which results in:
> 	<attach rdf:resource='Ping'/>
> Is it okay to directly convert something that's not a real URI?
>
> Cheers,
> -George
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 05:41:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:11 UTC