W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Attendees in public documents

From: Bill Kearney <wkearney99@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:31:40 -0400
Message-ID: <019001c30353$58f75940$2000a8c0@wkearney.com>
To: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
Cc: "Gary McGath" <callist@mcgath.com>, "www-rdf-calendar" <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>

You can also do it via javascript.

I have a hash-maker at:
http://feeds.archive.org/misc/hash


----- Original Message -----
From: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
Cc: "Gary McGath" <callist@mcgath.com>; "www-rdf-calendar"
<www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: Attendees in public documents


>
>
> my foaf harvester turns every email address into a hash and uses
> these for matches. There are plenty of online converters and code for
> doing this, e.g.
>
> Morten Frederiksen's online converter
> http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/sha1ify/
>
> in the context of foaf, an online converter by Leigh Dodds:
> http://www.ldodds.com/foaf/foaf-a-matic.html
>
> I found some snippets of code that also do this:
>
> Java
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/200303/geo/JavaSha1.java
>
> Perl
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/200303/geo/PerlSha1.pl
>
> These all hash the mailto: part as well as the actual mail address.
>
> Libby
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
> >
> > FOAF systems are now using a one-way hash of the mailbox - one of the
> > benefits of RDF is that we should be able to copy it pretty easily.
> >
> > Are there any FOAF systems that understand the equivalence between a hash of
> > the box and the thing itself - i.e. know how to run a hash over a foaf:mbox
> > so it can be compared to a foaf:sha1 ? I don't know.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Chaals
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Gary McGath wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >The iCalendar standard recommends representing an attendee with an email
> > >address.  For public documents, this isn't always desirable, for reasons
> > >everyone knows.  So far in TimeCzar I've been just filling this in as
> > >"x@x.invalid", and putting the attendee's actual name in the "CN"
> > >property.  Is this the best thing to do, or are there other alternatives
> > >that would be more appropriate?
> > >
> > >BTW, I'm working on a feature for the next TimeCzar beta which will
> > >allow the site maintainer to expose the entire data file as an iCalendar
> > >document.  I'm hoping this will be useful for people who want to make
> > >calendar data available to Web client applications.  (Sorry, I still
> > >haven't touched CAP support.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Gary McGath       http://www.mcgath.com/consulting/
> > >callist@mcgath.com accepts ONLY mail sent to specified mailing lists.
> > >For other purposes, please send mail to gmcgath at the same domain.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134
136
> > SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78
22
> >  Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
> >  W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 09:31:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:11 UTC