W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2003

Re: next RDF calendar meeting time difficulty

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 11:32:31 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030401113043.02f23d00@127.0.0.1>
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org

This message reminds me of an old joke about cancellation of a 
clairvoyants' society meeting due to unforeseen circumstances...

#g
--

At 16:42 31/03/2003 +0100, Libby Miller wrote:


>Last meeting we
>
>RESOLVED: to meet every other weds at 1500Z for up to 90 min thru
>WWW2003
>
>http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/03/26/2003-03-26.html#1048697881.388674
>
>This seems to have been a typo, and we actually meant to write 1700UTC.
>
>I propose that to avoid further confusion, we go for *1500UTC* for next
>meeting, which would be:
>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=9&month=4&year=2003&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
>
>and probably revert back to 1700UTC the time after that.
>
>Another reason to do this is that Jim Ley can make 1500UTC but not
>1700UTC, and a proposed topic for the next meeting is mixing
>Geographical information with events information - (see the entry on the
>ESW wiki, feel free to add your own agenda suggestions:
>
>http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendar)
>
>Jim has done a lot of very interesting work in this area (for example
>http://jibbering.com/foaf/foaf-people-map.svg) so it would be
>a shame if he could not make it.
>
>I'm aware that this is not ideal. Please squeal if you have any
>objections and we'll see if we can compromise somehow.
>
>cheers
>
>Libby

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2003 08:33:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:11 UTC