W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Ancestors and siblings

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:16:18 -0700
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C702FE6867@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>, <www-ql@w3.org>

No problem. Michael's book had to be finalized slightly before the last
call was published. So some of the last minute changes did not make it.
I am sure he will update this in the next version.

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Spaeth [mailto:donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:13 PM
> To: Michael Rys; www-ql@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Ancestors and siblings
> 
> Michael,
> My source was Michael Brundage's new book on XQuery, pp. 68-69.
However,
> I
> had not appreciated the finer points of the distinction between XQuery
1.0
> and XPath 2.0, and XQuery was my main concern.  In any case, I am glad
to
> learn that they aren't as gone as I had feared.  Thanks to Jan for the
> pointer to full-axis feature.
> 
> Cheers,
> Don
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
> To: "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>; <>
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Ancestors and siblings
> 
> 
> XPath 2.0 still has them and for XQuery they have been added as
optional
> in the last call draft. Why do you think they are gone?
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
> 
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 16:23:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:10:19 GMT