W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: ugly-printed use cases output

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:44:45 -0700
To: "Michael Brundage" <xquery@comcast.net>, "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, <www-ql@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOGEJICNAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

Hi Michael,
Thanks for the offer. I've already got all the output via copy-and-paste,
but it's all pretty-printed and I'm looking for the raw stuff. I'm surprised
that's not a normative document.
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ql-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ql-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Michael Brundage
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:39 PM
> To: Howard Katz; Jonathan Robie; www-ql@w3.org 2
> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output
>
>
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> I wrote a little perl script that extracts most of queries and output
> directly from the Use Cases document itself.  If I recall correctly, there
> were places where the document structure is inconsistent, so you
> have to do
> a little fixup afterwards.  If you're interested, let me know and I'll dig
> it out and send it to you.
>
> Yours,
> michael
>
> On 10/22/03 5:35 PM, "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com> wrote:
> > Nobody else thinks a normative version of this might be a good thing to
> > have? I stand forelornly alone?
> > Howard
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:08 PM
> >> To: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output
> >>
> >>
> >> At 05:16 PM 10/22/2003, Howard Katz wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there a full version of the Use Cases output available
> somewhere that
> >>> isn't pretty-printed? I'd find it useful for checking
> compliance against
> >>> whitespace-handling requirements. Pretty printing is nice to
> look at but
> >>> makes it harder to see if I'm doing whitespace properly. Does
> >> such a beast
> >>> exist?
> >>
> >> Nope! Sorry....
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 20:44:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:16 UTC