Re: [RDFa] Test Suite - next steps

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> All,
>  
> After some discussion and some contemplation [1] and [2], 
> I'd like to propose the following resolutions w.r.t. the
> RDFa Test Suite:
>  
> 1. We avoid the term 'conformance testing' at all
>    (the former CQ is now called Test Query);
>   

That suits my preference, thanks.

I have to admit my case is less than compelling. The meaning of the
term seems to have drifted since I learned it, or something.
> Comments welcome; hope DanC can agree ;)
>   

Again, all of this infrastructure stuff is well and good, I guess, but
what I want most is a handful of fairly complete tests; preferably
tests based on examples that are being advertised widely, e.g.
those in the primer.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/