- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:25:15 -0600
- To: www-qa@w3.org
After reading the first few messages in this thread, I was prompted to turn my scribbly notes in http://esw.w3.org/topic/RequirementsDocument into prose. Here's the bit relevant to this thread: [[ Requirements should be objective and testable. This is not to say that things that are not testable have no place; the [WWW]design goals of XML 1.0 were an important part of the consensus process. But design goals, objectives and the like should be clearly distinguished from testable, objective requirements. ]] -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/RequirementsDocument Now I see that Tim found this is the consensus of a wider community... > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requirement perhaps that subsumes/obsoletes esw:RequirementsDocument. Or perhaps the local version is worth maintaining? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:25:52 UTC