W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > April 2003

Re: profiles/modules/levels -- 2 of 2

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:53:38 -0400
Message-Id: <a0521060cbacc65a576b4@[10.0.1.3]>
To: www-qa@w3.org

At 13:10 -0600 2003-04-22, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>Summary of my opinions on profile/module/level:
>
>1.) combine the 3 concepts?  I'm opposed.

I agree the 3 concepts are different.

>2.) keep separate concepts, DoV and CPs but combine under one GL?  Maybe.

It maybe a good way to help people by a kind of adaptable CP.

if we have checkpoint where the wording is exactly the same.

If you have {VAR}, you must do this.

	where VAR = [modules, profiles, level, ...]


>4.) "4. Definitions" -- we might be able to improve some, but will 
>*never* succeed in compact definitions that are sharp enough to 
>completely prevent misuse of concepts.

	hmmm... yes a definition is always a definition and concepts 
are here to be interpreted sometimes. The definition must be as short 
and clear as possible for a human person, and examples are here to 
provide non-normative illustration.



-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 12:12:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT