- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:44:18 -0600
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa@w3.org
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:43:05 UTC
(Switched reply to IG list...)
It sounds like something that we should talk about. Should I queue an
issue, to be sure it isn't lost?
I'm not sure that the new scheme is generally applicable (outside of
accessibility arena), from what I read at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-WCAG20-20020822/#conformance
But it would be good to understand the why and what of WAI's new approach
here, and either confirm or modify our own approach.
Do you want to pursue #1 below ("why")?
-Lofton.
At 11:35 AM 9/27/02 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:
>It seems that the WCAG WG, in their recently published Working Draft of
>Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
>(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-WCAG20-20020822/) has changed their
>conformance criteria - from using Priorities to using Levels (Minimum,
>Level 2, Level 3). As stated, the WCAG improvements include: Ensure that
>requirements may be applied across technologies, Ensure that the
>conformance requirements are clear, Ensure that the deliverables are easy
>to use
>
>We may want to:
>1. learn from them, why the change.
>2. review our use of Priority 1,2,3.
>
>regards
>Lynne
>
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:43:05 UTC