Within the SpecGL, Section 6 References has the additional qualifier, "(non-normative)". Although logic tells us that non-normative is the same as informative, is there a reason that we did not label this section "informative". The reason for this question, is that we don't define non-normative but define informative. Additionally, Checkpoint 13.2 states: Distinguish normative and informative text and Checkpoint 13.4 states: use consistent terminology. My recommendation is obvious - replace non-normative with informative. regards LynneReceived on Friday, 27 September 2002 10:56:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT