W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2002

Framework documents nature

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 12:49:56 +0100
Message-Id: <200201071149.g07BnuC19200@zidane.inria.fr>
To: ij@w3.org
cc: www-qa@w3.org

Ian, I took an action item on the QAWG telecon the other day, which is 
to ask you, our W3C Process Master, how the series of documents in the 
QA Framework should be presented in terms of Note/WD status ?

The WG goal for these documents is to deliver them as W3C Note.
First, do you agree with this plan. The Framework describes process
oriented ideas, more than technologies per se. A W3C Note sitting on
/TR is a way to make it a bit more formal in a sense, although this
may be achieved otherwise. What do you think ?

If a Note.
Should the various drafts be called Draft Note, or just Working Draft?
I think it's WD.

Should the css used be the W3C Note one (as now) or the WD one ?
I sort of feel it should be WD, given the answer to the previous
question.

Anyway, your help appreciated.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 06:49:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:58 GMT