W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > August 2002

Clarification on spec categories [was: Where "Rules for Profiles" fit into Spec Guidelines]

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 12 Aug 2002 16:08:05 +0200
To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <1029161286.16595.587.camel@stratustier>

I think it would be worth clarifying the following points on the list of
categories for specification [1]:
- the categorization mechanism is not described: it would be good to say
from where this categorization comes. It's probably as simple as "what
the specification describes"
- the 4th bullet "processors" doesn't answer the same question as the
other bullets: XSLT doesn't specify a "processor", but a processing
language. I would say too that the 2nd bullet would be clearer with
"content/data formatting"

Another good thing would be to provide a table with the current W3C
Recommendations and the categories where they fit [not in the framework,
but as a companion document in /QA/ space for instance].

Dom

1.
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/08/qaframe-spec-0804.html#document-categories
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/INRIA
mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 10:08:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT