W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Discussion Item for tomorrow's telcon, forgot this one

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:48:07 -0700
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011205164254.02a67ac0@rockynet.com>
To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
I suspect that this is already done -- it is certainly intended.  The 
single Framework document input to Brussels was split into a family four, 
more focused, parts.  One of them deals with QA process and operational 
guidelines, and this is (at least) one place where the reference will appear.

-Lofton.

At 06:54 PM 12/5/01 +0100, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:
>Also, I would humbly ask that the DOM TS Process document 
>(http://www.w3.org/DOM/DOMTS-Process) and perhaps home page (which has 
>pointers to relevant resources, http://www.w3.org/DOM/Test) be put in the 
>reference section of the QA documentation, given that it has been 
>discussed on this list and also is quite broad in reach, sharing many 
>topics with QA.
>
>/Dimitris
>
>On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 06:19  PM, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:
>
>>I have proposed to the DOM IG that the process document for the DOM TS be 
>>brought in sync with the activity in QA, where appropriate. I would like 
>>to, if possible, take this up with you tomorrow, time allowing, in order 
>>to present my ideas as well as common denominators between DOM TS and QA 
>>given the experiences from the now 9 month old development process.
>>
>>Also, I think that this framework can contribute greatly, perhaps serving 
>>as a primer or boilerplate, for any QA-Test activity launched (I believe 
>>I read something about this in the existing QA documentation).
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>/Dimitris
>
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 18:47:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:58 GMT