Le mardi 10 mai 2005 à 08:37 -0600, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > By the way, while looking up TestFAQ on the Library page [2], I noticed this: > [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Taxonomy.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/Library/#ref > > Should we (QAWG) have a look at it sometime and see if it still matches (or > is consistent with) our view of the test/conformance landscape? Does it > need updating, or is it fine as it stands? Should it somehow be integrated > or referenced from other work? It seems sort of lonely and without context > there. I agree it doesn't have any real standing at this time, and lacks some context. Ideally, we would: * see whether there are ideas in there that we think are of interest; if not, we can simply drop it and mark it as historical * if yes, if they integrate better in one of our existing doc, move it there * otherwise and at the very least, add more context/descriptions Karl, maybe that something we could add to our agenda at some point? There is no emergency for this obviously, but if/when there is a bit of free time... Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 14:52:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT