W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2005

Re: New QA Framework Primer - version 2005-08-24

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:21:51 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050824161839.038b9a98@localhost>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

As a general rule, I like option #2 for specifications.  Is there a reason 
that we shouldn't do it for the Primer?

(One reason might be:  if we are going to replace the Primer very often, 
e.g., with small editorial fixes, then the previous-version-chain becomes 
too busy and is less interesting.)

-Lofton.


At 05:05 PM 8/24/2005 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:

>Lynne,
>
>I like very much the new document, It's very clear.
>
>Does the WG think that
>
>Option 1.
>I should replace the previous document with this one,
>
>OR
>
>Option 2.
>the WG would prefer to have a versioning of documents with Latest,
>Previous, etc.
>
>This version:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qaframe-primer
>Latest version:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/08/qaframe-primer-20050824
>Previous version:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/06/qaframe-primer-20050623
>
>
>
>--
>Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>W3C Conformance Manager
>*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 22:21:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Wednesday, 24 August 2005 22:21:38 GMT