Le 20 avr. 2005, à 08:00, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > OK, I understand now the intent, but I think it's a too narrow and > complex to be addressed in SpecGL. (in Björn's example, it may be as > well considered a bug in the XML spec as an ambiguity in the URI spec, > or a combination of both). so I reiterate my suggestion just to drop > it. No problem. I will edit ;) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 12:15:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT