W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:05:40 +0300
Message-Id: <e73dc3fe9bd606b54d04d5f0c46c5225@ontologicon.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>

I'm ready and online, please dial me in.

/Dimitris

On 11 Apr 2005, at 15:37, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:

QAWG telecon participants --

    Here is the final agenda for Monday teleconf, April 11th 2005. The
only change from the draft one is the added reference to the draft
Disposition of Comments document.

Dimitris, you're up to be the scribe; if you can't do it for some
reason, please make sure to contact the next persons on the list until
someone is available.
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/minuters

The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi? 
query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=Q 
A&content=

Agenda
    =====
    Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis, Lofton Henderson
    Chair: Dom
    Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt


1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership

2.) routine business
         * mention on final Dublin F2F dates; progress on organization?
	* Test FAQ progress?
	* Tim's questions wrt WCAG2
http://www.w3.org/mid/ 
5.1.1.5.2.20050324090705.00b1fdc0@mailserver.nist.gov

3.) SpecGL issues
Only 2 left!
#995 - Old potential Issues
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=995
	* Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they ought
to be closed as no longer relevant
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues.html#x45

#1089 - Address accessibility requirements
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
	* We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in our new
"Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about
accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations;
let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it,
and get someone an action item to draft a proposal



Implementation of resolved issues:
* Editors version has an updated table of contents, and a separate list
of requirements/good practices; comments/suggestions?
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#table-contents

* Editors version has an updated ICS:
  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics
with a new "Comments" column, and text inciting to link back to the
reviewed specification;
-> comments/suggestions?
-> a volunteer to complete SpecGL own ICS?

* More generally, we need as many people reading the document from top
to bottom to find inconsistencies, etc. due to the # of changes in the
text organization

* Responding to commenters, starting Disposition of Comments
-> needs several volunteers to draft answers to commenters
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/04/SpecGL-DoC.html
-> how to point people to implemented changes:
   * intermediate WD on /TR/? (cf 3 months rule)
   * WG draft in QA space?

    Logistics
    =====
    Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
    11:00am-12noon EST.
    code: 7294 ("QAWG")
    IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon

-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 15:05:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT