W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf

From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:05:46 -0700
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-id: <425ABC7A.9050000@sun.com>

I apologize for missing this morning's telecon - something came up at 
the last minute...

Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:

>QAWG telecon participants --
>
>   Here is the final agenda for Monday teleconf, April 11th 2005. The
>only change from the draft one is the added reference to the draft
>Disposition of Comments document.
>
>Dimitris, you're up to be the scribe; if you can't do it for some
>reason, please make sure to contact the next persons on the list until
>someone is available.
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/minuters 
>
>The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=
>
>Agenda
>   =====
>   Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis, Lofton Henderson
>   Chair: Dom
>   Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt
>
>
>1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership
>
>2.) routine business
>        * mention on final Dublin F2F dates; progress on organization?
>	* Test FAQ progress?
>	* Tim's questions wrt WCAG2
>http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.5.2.20050324090705.00b1fdc0@mailserver.nist.gov
>
>3.) SpecGL issues
>Only 2 left!
>#995 - Old potential Issues
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=995
>	* Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they ought
>to be closed as no longer relevant
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues.html#x45
>
>#1089 - Address accessibility requirements
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
>	* We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in our new
>"Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about
>accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations;
>let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it,
>and get someone an action item to draft a proposal
>
>
>
>Implementation of resolved issues:
>* Editors version has an updated table of contents, and a separate list
>of requirements/good practices; comments/suggestions?
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#table-contents
>
>* Editors version has an updated ICS:
> http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics 
>with a new "Comments" column, and text inciting to link back to the
>reviewed specification;
>-> comments/suggestions?
>-> a volunteer to complete SpecGL own ICS?
>
>* More generally, we need as many people reading the document from top
>to bottom to find inconsistencies, etc. due to the # of changes in the
>text organization
>
>* Responding to commenters, starting Disposition of Comments
>-> needs several volunteers to draft answers to commenters
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/04/SpecGL-DoC.html
>-> how to point people to implemented changes:
>  * intermediate WD on /TR/? (cf 3 months rule)
>  * WG draft in QA space?
>
>   Logistics
>   =====
>   Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
>   11:00am-12noon EST.
>   code: 7294 ("QAWG")
>   IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 18:04:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT