W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

old issues CR45 - CR57

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:02:39 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 12:06 PM 4/8/2005 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>3.) SpecGL issues
>Only 2 left!
>#995 - Old potential Issues
>         * Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they 
> ought
>to be closed as no longer relevant

I have reviewed these individually.  They should all be considered closed 
("moot" is probably a more accurate classification).

Btw, while reviewing these, I came across the story in "3.  Beyond 
Conformance" [1].  Recall that I objected to some details -- while it is a 
good story, it is not completely accurate when attributed to QAWG.  For 
example, the lagging supplemental parts (E&T) were not because of lack of 
review or consideration, but were a very conscious choice (probably a poor 
choice in retrospect).

Any case ... I recall now that I had an AI to propose rewording, but I 
can't find any such.  Am I remembering wrong?


[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec#beyond-conformance
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 14:04:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:34 UTC