W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:12:10 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050411080959.021d3f40@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

Regrets.

(Sorry for late notice ... unanticipated circumstances beyond my control.)

-Lofton

At 02:37 PM 4/11/2005 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>QAWG telecon participants --
>
>    Here is the final agenda for Monday teleconf, April 11th 2005. The
>only change from the draft one is the added reference to the draft
>Disposition of Comments document.
>
>Dimitris, you're up to be the scribe; if you can't do it for some
>reason, please make sure to contact the next persons on the list until
>someone is available.
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/minuters
>
>The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=
>
>Agenda
>    =====
>    Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis, Lofton Henderson
>    Chair: Dom
>    Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt
>
>
>1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership
>
>2.) routine business
>         * mention on final Dublin F2F dates; progress on organization?
>         * Test FAQ progress?
>         * Tim's questions wrt WCAG2
>http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.5.2.20050324090705.00b1fdc0@mailserver.nist.gov
>
>3.) SpecGL issues
>Only 2 left!
>#995 - Old potential Issues
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=995
>         * Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they 
> ought
>to be closed as no longer relevant
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues.html#x45
>
>#1089 - Address accessibility requirements
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
>         * We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in 
> our new
>"Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about
>accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations;
>let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it,
>and get someone an action item to draft a proposal
>
>
>
>Implementation of resolved issues:
>* Editors version has an updated table of contents, and a separate list
>of requirements/good practices; comments/suggestions?
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#table-contents
>
>* Editors version has an updated ICS:
>  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics
>with a new "Comments" column, and text inciting to link back to the
>reviewed specification;
>-> comments/suggestions?
>-> a volunteer to complete SpecGL own ICS?
>
>* More generally, we need as many people reading the document from top
>to bottom to find inconsistencies, etc. due to the # of changes in the
>text organization
>
>* Responding to commenters, starting Disposition of Comments
>-> needs several volunteers to draft answers to commenters
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/04/SpecGL-DoC.html
>-> how to point people to implemented changes:
>   * intermediate WD on /TR/? (cf 3 months rule)
>   * WG draft in QA space?
>
>    Logistics
>    =====
>    Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
>    11:00am-12noon EST.
>    code: 7294 ("QAWG")
>    IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon
>
>--
>Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
>
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 14:12:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT