W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: [DRAFT] Wednesday (24 November) QA WG telecon Agenda

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:04:01 +0100
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1100873040.9463.6.camel@stratustier>
Le mer 17/11/2004 ŗ 20:16, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
>   Agenda
>   =====
>
> 2.) routine business

Specific items that we need to discuss:
Technical Plenary meeting:
* based on the feedback I received to my previous mail, I've requested a
slot on Thursday/Friday; we should confirm that this works for everybody
* is there any specific group we want to meet during the week?

> 3.) QA Framework Specification Guidelines Review
> 4.) QA Framework Specification Guidelines Promotion - 
> Pre-Implementation Report

More generally, we should try to set up a detailed plan on who should
feel responsible to get responsible from whom; as a reminder, the
feedback we'll get on the document will be a crucial part of determining
whether the WG can continue to push it to Rec or not.

> Then we will be able to enter CR having already an implementation
> experience.

FWIW, one of the goal might actually be to skip CR altogether (and go
directly to PR), if we have enough implementations out there; that's
what WebArch did, although they had a very wide set of reviews that made
it easier for them to argue the case.

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Friday, 19 November 2004 14:04:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT