Le mer 17/11/2004 à 20:16, Karl Dubost a écrit : > Agenda > ===== > > 2.) routine business Specific items that we need to discuss: Technical Plenary meeting: * based on the feedback I received to my previous mail, I've requested a slot on Thursday/Friday; we should confirm that this works for everybody * is there any specific group we want to meet during the week? > 3.) QA Framework Specification Guidelines Review > 4.) QA Framework Specification Guidelines Promotion - > Pre-Implementation Report More generally, we should try to set up a detailed plan on who should feel responsible to get responsible from whom; as a reminder, the feedback we'll get on the document will be a crucial part of determining whether the WG can continue to push it to Rec or not. > Then we will be able to enter CR having already an implementation > experience. FWIW, one of the goal might actually be to skip CR altogether (and go directly to PR), if we have enough implementations out there; that's what WebArch did, although they had a very wide set of reviews that made it easier for them to argue the case. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Friday, 19 November 2004 14:04:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT