W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SpecGL - typos

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:41:44 +0100
To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1100857303.30774.764.camel@stratustier>
Le ven 19/11/2004 ŗ 04:57, Lynne Rosenthal a ťcrit :
> Just finished reading SpecGL (cover to cover).  Thank you Karl and Dom
> for putting so much of your time into getting this together and
> published. 

Thanks for the thorough review!

> Since we advocate doing a quality review of the document, I hope its
> not too late to make some of these changes typos, awkward English,
> missing words, etc.

I've integrated the changes you proposed; a few notes below on some I
didn't:

> 7. Is the heading for 1.1B there?  Im working off line from the
> version Dom sent yesterday

No, there isn't, but nor shouldn't there be one. The previous heading is
"1.1", not 1.1.A, although this may be confusing since the actual
heading starts with "A" ("A conformance clause is essential").

> 15. 4.3A  Address Extensibility  (is the 4.3A Requirement there?, its
> not on my copy)

I see it there; I hope I haven't missed something obvious...

Thanks again!

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Friday, 19 November 2004 09:41:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT