W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Optional Features

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:08:49 +0100
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1100621328.30774.356.camel@stratustier>
Le mar 16/11/2004 ŗ 16:52, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
> QA WG,
> 
> Look at the title of 4.2C and tell me if you think it's wrong.

It does look wrong, indeed. I'm not sure why the "any limitations or
constraints" has been deleted, rather than simply completed by "on
optional features".

> 4.2 Good Practice A: Make sure there is a need for the optional feature
> 4.2 Good Practice B: Clearly identify optional feature
> 4.2 Good Practice C: Indicate optional feature
> 		(previous was: Indicate any limitations or constraints)

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:08:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT