Re: Document License prohibits profiles?

I also think that this is a good question for the IG - can you send your 
original question to the IG list and see if that raises some 
interest/concerns.

lynne

At 09:49 AM 11/4/2004, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>At 09:05 AM 11/4/2004 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
> >Le jeu 04/11/2004 à 00:18, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> > > Is it legal for an individual or group to write a profile of a Rec which
> > > contains the Document License [1]?  That license says:
> >
> >FWIW, the right mailing list to ask this question is site-policy@w3.org
> >(non publicly archived).
>
>That may be the place to find the answer.  But the question is definitely
>relevant here, to our work.  We are investing a lot of energy into the
>topics areound "subdividing the specification".  Our ViS (supporting
>SpecGL) even recommends rules for profiles to support "derived profiles",
>e.g., by external groups.
>
>I will ask the question.  But I think QAWG should be prepared to take a
>position.
>
>-Lofton.
>
>
>
>