W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Document License prohibits profiles?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 07:49:40 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20041104074425.0237e738@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 09:05 AM 11/4/2004 +0100, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le jeu 04/11/2004 ŗ 00:18, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> > Is it legal for an individual or group to write a profile of a Rec which
> > contains the Document License [1]?  That license says:
>
>FWIW, the right mailing list to ask this question is site-policy@w3.org
>(non publicly archived).

That may be the place to find the answer.  But the question is definitely 
relevant here, to our work.  We are investing a lot of energy into the 
topics areound "subdividing the specification".  Our ViS (supporting 
SpecGL) even recommends rules for profiles to support "derived profiles", 
e.g., by external groups.

I will ask the question.  But I think QAWG should be prepared to take a 
position.

-Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:50:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT