Re: Proposed resolutions for procedural issues in CR comments

At 05:44 PM 3/17/04 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>Le mer 17/03/2004 à 17:11, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> >
> > AI-20040126-3 DH,  to send a proposed answer to procedural issues
>
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/02/cr-issues
>
>I believe issues 3/32 [...] Regarding CR-33, CR-34, CR-41, [...]

Okay, I'll document those proposals when I next update the issues list.


>CR-36 is still pending as far as I can tell, since we don't have yet a
>plan to amend our charter with regard to conformance to our own
>documents, nor have we yet defined the conformance models of our new
>documents.

Should we generate a new AI for someone to propose an amendment to fix 
it?  Or is it good enough for now to just leave CR-26 open?

-Lofton.