W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Proposed resolutions for procedural issues in CR comments

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:26:57 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 05:44 PM 3/17/04 +0100, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le mer 17/03/2004 ŗ 17:11, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> >
> > AI-20040126-3 DH,  to send a proposed answer to procedural issues
>I believe issues 3/32 [...] Regarding CR-33, CR-34, CR-41, [...]

Okay, I'll document those proposals when I next update the issues list.

>CR-36 is still pending as far as I can tell, since we don't have yet a
>plan to amend our charter with regard to conformance to our own
>documents, nor have we yet defined the conformance models of our new

Should we generate a new AI for someone to propose an amendment to fix 
it?  Or is it good enough for now to just leave CR-26 open?

Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 13:23:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:32 UTC