Re: Proposed resolutions for procedural issues in CR comments

Le mer 17/03/2004 à 19:26, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> >CR-36 is still pending as far as I can tell, since we don't have yet a
> >plan to amend our charter with regard to conformance to our own
> >documents, nor have we yet defined the conformance models of our new
> >documents.
> 
> Should we generate a new AI for someone to propose an amendment to fix 
> it?  Or is it good enough for now to just leave CR-26 open?

Let's leave it as an open issue for now ; I don't have enough cycles
these days to deal with it, and I think I'm the most appropriate person
to do so.

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org