W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Proposed resolutions for procedural issues in CR comments

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:53:25 +0100
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1079952723.28243.374.camel@stratustier>
Le mer 17/03/2004 ŗ 19:26, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> >CR-36 is still pending as far as I can tell, since we don't have yet a
> >plan to amend our charter with regard to conformance to our own
> >documents, nor have we yet defined the conformance models of our new
> >documents.
> 
> Should we generate a new AI for someone to propose an amendment to fix 
> it?  Or is it good enough for now to just leave CR-26 open?

Let's leave it as an open issue for now ; I don't have enough cycles
these days to deal with it, and I think I'm the most appropriate person
to do so.

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 05:53:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT