- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 15:52:50 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG, Tomorrow (Wednesday), I'll try to finish and circulate my AI for enumerating the QAH issues. Today, here are the sources that I'll expand upon. For now, am I forgetting any stacked issues or issue sources? Has anyone made any comments that you'd like to have discussed as issues next week? E.g., Karl, are any of your past comments early in QAH drafting still applicable? Dan Connolly: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004May/0043.html Synopsis: likes overall direction; suggests that "IPR" should be replaced with clearer, more specific terms like patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, or else with "legal issues" where a generalization is needed. Jeremy Carroll: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004May/0044.html Synopsis: looks very good, approve overall direction, detailed comments to follow http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Jun/0000.html Synopsis: [@@numerous detailed comments@@] Dom: @@suggestions about use of word "staff"@@ Other: terminology like "QA deliverables" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Apr/0059.html Synopsis: Mark Skall did an AI to replace fuzzy wording. Other: [LH to identify bits in the QAH text that have issues] Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 17:59:18 UTC