Le lun 23/08/2004 à 16:56, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > Editorial Notes: > > ** I would change the list of "seven DoV" to numbered, instead of bullet. Done > ** I notice that the glossary of SpecLite does not contain definitions for > profiles, modules, etc. Karl, could you fix this? Or do you mean there should be another glossary in this document? > ** "Specification Category" -- this is under-specified. I.e., it is > difficult to understand both the explanations of the different categories > (they each need at least a sentence of definition/discussion), and how this > is critical to variability analysis. I myself would have difficulty > writing a Spec. Cat. analysis based on this. We should develop the section > better, or remove it. For now, maybe "green flag" it to indicate that we > think it needs attention. I've added an introduction to the section that tries to relate the specification categories to classes of products and variability; I have flagged an issue at the start of the section for the other issues. Thanks for the comments, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 25 August 2004 08:44:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT