Re: "Variability in Specifications" WG draft

Le lun 23/08/2004 à 16:56, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> Editorial Notes:
> 
> ** I would change the list of "seven DoV" to numbered, instead of bullet.

Done

> ** I notice that the glossary of SpecLite does not contain definitions for 
> profiles, modules, etc.

Karl, could you fix this?
Or do you mean there should be another glossary in this document?

> ** "Specification Category" -- this is under-specified.  I.e., it is 
> difficult to understand both the explanations of the different categories 
> (they each need at least a sentence of definition/discussion), and how this 
> is critical to variability analysis.  I myself would have difficulty 
> writing a Spec. Cat. analysis based on this.  We should develop the section 
> better, or remove it.  For now, maybe "green flag" it to indicate that we 
> think it needs attention.

I've added an introduction to the section that tries to relate the
specification categories to classes of products and variability; I have
flagged an issue at the start of the section for the other issues.

Thanks for the comments,

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org