Re: Conformance to SpecGL

• From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
• Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:13:33 -0400
• To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20040812160137.01c9e908@wsxg03.nist.gov>

We should discuss this - I am undecided as to whether there is such a thing 
as conformance to SpecGL.  We did get input from Jeremy who stated that 
conformance could be to the Principles.

As to proposed words.... I would stay away from mentioning test 
assertions.  I'll try to think about this and draft something.

--lynne


>Conformance to this document
>
>There is no such thing as being conformant to Specification Guidelines. 
>Though the document is organized as a set of principles and good 
>practices. This set defines test assertions for this document and 
>techniques are possible test cases for the implementation of these test 
>assertions.
>
>[@@something about "could be as a conformance requirement" prose here?@@]

Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 20:13:30 UTC