Actually, panel proposals are due on November 14, but they will take an "Intent to Submit" by November 1. I think the proposal has to provide actual names of panelists. I can check on whether the intent message should include the draft of the submission. At the 10/15 teleconference, you should think about this part of my draft: Panel: mix of points of view among a purist/idealist, pragmatist, victim of poor past practices, implementer of a W3C spec, possibly a spec editor, possibly a trainer/author. (Other ideas?) Moderator is a QA professional. Do you have nominees? I'm nominating myself for moderator. I nominate Patrick as a purist. .................David MarstonReceived on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:59:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT