W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Ops/Spec Reviews Organization

From: lynne rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@Nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:42:33 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031113193438.00b133c8@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

I have asked Tim Boland, who is the CSS QA moderator to review OpsGL and 
apply it to CSS WG.  Then he and I will go through it, together.  Our goal 
will be to see what CSS does - and complement them on it and for what they 
don't do - identify the easy CPs to implement and also see which CPs they 
won't implement and why.

lynne

--Lynne

At 10:18 PM 11/12/2003, Karl Dubost wrote:


>Le Mercredi, 12 nove 2003, à 23:51 Asia/Tokyo, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
>>The 24th November telecon is principally about "in-reach reports" [1], as 
>>we discussed and decided at Boulder ("last Monday of each month").
>>
>>Because you are doing a lot of in-reach to WGs, and because you did the 
>>direct mail to a half-dozen WGs about OpsGL CR, and etc ... that's why it 
>>would be valuable for you to participate.  I was not thinking only about 
>>the OpsGL review assignments [2].
>
>in-reach report that all individual persons of the WG can do:
>
>* Ops Implementation
>         http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/ops-implementation
>* Spec Implementation
>         http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/10/specgl-implementation
>
>Any persons of the WG who has progress contacts, etc, Send a mail to the 
>WG or qa-chairs asking for updating the information and it will help all 
>of us to track the information.
>         I or dom will be able to modify the information in the pages.
>
>>And finish when?  Shall we discuss & decide this on 24/26 Nov, along with 
>>"confirm that you have accepted"?
>
>I think we should finish before Christmas. So we will be able to make the 
>reviews useful and push things if they are needed.
>
>
>PLEASE CONFIRM HERE.
>         So I can fill the table of reviews [1]
>
>I propose this:
>         I have removed Lynne Rosenthal from OpsGL review because of the 
> selling points for SpecGL
>         I have removed Patrick Curran from OpsGL review because of the 
> editing of TestGL.
>
>                 DEADLINE:  2003-12-20
>
>                                                 Ops             Spec
>
>Dimitris Dimitriadis:   DOM             DOM
>Karl Dubost                     :       RDFCore RDF Specs
>                                                 OWL             OWL
>Dominique Hazael-M      :       QA              QA Ops GL/Spec
>                                                 CSS?    CSS?
>Lofton Henderson        :       SVG             SVG
>David Marston           :       XSL             XSLT, XPath, XQuery
>Sandra Martinez         :       XML             XML Namespaces 1.1
>                                                                 XML 1.1
>Patrick Curran          :                       CC/PP
>Vanitha Venkatraman :   Voice   VoiceXML
>Lynne Rosenthal         :                       XForms
>Andrew Thackrah         :       HTML    XHTML 2.0
>Olivier Thereaux        :       WCAG    WCAG 2.0
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/09/qa-ops-reviews
>
>--
>Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>W3C Conformance Manager
>*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 19:42:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT