W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2003

levels, modules and profiles. AI-20030414

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:25:22 -0500
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <F0D23F5E-0E11-11D8-8488-000A95718F82@w3.org>


Le Mercredi, 29 octo 2003, à 11:28 America/Montreal, Dominique 
Hazaël-Massieux a écrit :

> Le mer 29/10/2003 à 17:08, Karl Dubost a écrit :
>> Le mercredi, 29 oct 2003, à 08:52 America/Montreal, Dominique
>> Hazaël-Massieux a écrit :
>>> AI-20030414-4:  will report on how the terms "levels", "profiles", 
>>> and
>>> "modules" are
>>> used in W3C (deadline:  2003-04-23)
>>
>> done for a long time, was a mail in the mailing list. Can't find it.
>
> Actually, I don't remember having seen it... Are you sure you sent it?
> (FWIW, I have closed the AI, but I would appreciate if you can find a
> reference anyway).

To read
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Aug/0079

In short, right now at W3C, each WG have different concepts of what's a 
profile a module or a level and sometimes, for example, levels are used 
for versioning.

So I wonder if we should create a table with 3 columns

		| Module | Level | Profiles | <- QA WG definitions
-------------------------------------
Spec A								  <- how it's called by
-------------------------------------    others WGs.
Spec B
-------------------------------------
Spec C
-------------------------------------

Like it will be a long work to do, do you think it's valuable?



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 10:25:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT