- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:25:22 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Le Mercredi, 29 octo 2003, à 11:28 America/Montreal, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > Le mer 29/10/2003 à 17:08, Karl Dubost a écrit : >> Le mercredi, 29 oct 2003, à 08:52 America/Montreal, Dominique >> Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : >>> AI-20030414-4: will report on how the terms "levels", "profiles", >>> and >>> "modules" are >>> used in W3C (deadline: 2003-04-23) >> >> done for a long time, was a mail in the mailing list. Can't find it. > > Actually, I don't remember having seen it... Are you sure you sent it? > (FWIW, I have closed the AI, but I would appreciate if you can find a > reference anyway). To read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Aug/0079 In short, right now at W3C, each WG have different concepts of what's a profile a module or a level and sometimes, for example, levels are used for versioning. So I wonder if we should create a table with 3 columns | Module | Level | Profiles | <- QA WG definitions ------------------------------------- Spec A <- how it's called by ------------------------------------- others WGs. Spec B ------------------------------------- Spec C ------------------------------------- Like it will be a long work to do, do you think it's valuable? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 10:25:08 UTC