W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Two priority-change issues -- 2nd

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:25:27 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030515101523.035c6a30@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

[I added links to yesterday's WG-discussion draft, reflecting the 
"Proposal" for the two active priority-change issues.]

QAWG --

Any comments on these?

Amongst our LC-queued issues and comments, there is a loose end about some 
priority-change requests.  There is still dissent about these two 
checkpoints' priorities:

CP2.3 [1]:
-----
KG argues for P2.
LH argues to keep P1.
No one else has commented.

Proposal:  P1

(Should we add a clarifying note?  Like "W3C allows a WG to have several 
participants per Member, and it is up to the WG to determine any further 
restrictions, composition by specialty, etc.")

CP3.2 [2]:
-----
XML Schema wanted P1 instead of P3.
QAWG tentatively agreed.
KG argued for P2, LH agrees.
No one else has commented.

Proposal:  P2

Note
-----
We have consensus on:

CP3.2 -- leave it at P2 (contra XML Schema, who wanted P1)

CP8.2 -- change from P2 to P1.
CP4.5 -- change from P1 to P2.


Regards,
-Lofton.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/qaframe-ops-20030514#Ck-call-for-participation
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/qaframe-ops-20030514#Ck-support-spec-version
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:22:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT