W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2003

seeking clarification of your comments

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:10:38 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030621110113.02eba020@rockynet.com>
To: ij@w3.org
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Hi Ian,

We were discussing one of your SpecGL Last Call comments, and had a couple 
of questions of clarification.  It is the issue we call LC-29.4, which is 
sub-issue number 4 of LC-29 [1]:

>4. It might be valuable to explain some desirable characteristics of a 
>specified technical requirement:
>
>    1. Mutual independence from other requirements
>    2. Expresses a minimal requirement
>    3. Distinguish and label: requirements, exceptions to those 
> requirements, necessary and/or sufficient techniques for satisfying those 
> requirements.

On both of the first two points, we could see multiple ways to define your 
terms, respectively:

"mutual independence"
and, "minimal requirement".

For example, some people thought that minimal meant "atomic" -- not easily 
sub-dividable or factorable -- and some thought it could mean a requirement 
establishing a minimum.  There were multiple different ideas about what 
"mutual independence" might mean.

Could you elaborate a little bit, exactly what you meant for both cases?

Thanks,
-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/lc-issues#x29
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2003 13:09:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT