W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: proposed text for LC96 -

From: <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 21:38:53 -0400
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF1A8EFCA.41F3BC96-ON85256D3F.0008AAE0-85256D3F.00090F40@lotus.com>

Lynne proposed for CP3.1:
>Rationale: the reader must be able to recognize any minimum
>functionality, complexity or support that applies to conforming
>products of a specific class. It helps the reader find these
>requirements by presenting them as a collection, in one place rather
>than distributed throughout the document.

My spin on this:
The minimum requirements can be considered the seed of a checklist
to be used by a team developing a conforming product.
How about putting this sentence between the other two?
.................David Marston
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2003 21:39:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:30 UTC